We are almost out of time to win the battle against climate change and start the process of climate recovery.Ĭ02 levels are over 415 ppm and climbing. 10’s apparent dark ops to one side, and focus on the real issue. However, there have also been reports of her falling out with senior UK officials and giving confusing and contradictory messages to other countries on the UK’s COP 26 strategy.īut let’s leave my disappointment with the firing process and No. The Guardian has received mixed reports of O’Neill’s performance in the role, with some saying she made a good impression in foreign capitals and at the UN’s Madrid climate conference last year. Given my track record and our long and honest working relationship that is quite disgraceful. Just for good measure, almost every negative media story (and none of the good stuff) over the last eleven years was included in the briefings just to spice them up and to detract from the real failings and real concerns about the COP26 process and progress. Most seriously, the Guardian uncovered an alleged incident in which three unions complained to the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy that she had shouted and sworn at civil servants.Įqually, reports of ‘problems on international engagements’ stemmed from a single blog post which I believe can be completely rebutted by the emails, reports and public statements from our ambassadors and international stakeholders. Later, she put down David Davies when he mixed her up with another Tory woman in cabinet. Early on, she had to apologise to parliament for asking aloud who she needed to “give a blowjob to” in order to be called on to speak.
#Civil 3d report station offset to point edit series#
To take two examples: “bullying allegations” were referred to, when you are aware that there was a single historical complaint, which was fully investigated by the Cabinet office and found to be entirely without merit.Ĭlaire O’Neill – known by her previous married name of Claire Perry until her second marriage in 2018 – was best known before her appointment as COP president for a series of colourful incidents.
10 is rumoured to be behind the media briefings put out to support your decision, which variously contained awful, false and distorted defamatory allegations. It was very disheartening in this context to learn that No. You did, of course, know my seniority and experience when you offered me the job and my track record of delivery from persuading the Cabinet to host COP26, winning the COP bid in partnership with Italy, publishing the Clean Growth Strategy, introducing our historic Net Zero legislation, launching the global Powering Past Coal Alliance and negotiating the Offshore Wind Sector Deal that has made our vast offshore renewable energy source cheaper than fossil fuel alternatives. I was given three separate explanations for the decision, none of which could be clearly articulated or supported with evidence, apart from needing someone more senior. I was surprised and dismayed to be phoned by Dominic Cummings last Friday to be told I was no longer required to act as your COP (Conference of the UN Parties) President. Here is the text of her letter, and the Guardian’s analysis of what her words really mean.
0 kommentar(er)
